Month: November 2019

Can you do good records management if you don’t do good security management?

The New South Wales Audit Office has just criticised 40 of the largest NSW government agencies for failures in their information governance. The Department of Education, NSW Police, Treasury and Service NSW were all found to have shortfalls in both records management and the security management of their high-risk data. Two of the findings common …

Can you do good records management if you don’t do good security management? Read More »

The inevitability of automation

Visit iDM Magazine for our latest article on trends in information regulation affecting organisations – and what this means for traditional records management. The drive to automate comes partly from Federal government (the Department of Finance recommended a move to automation in 2015), but mostly from the impracticality of continuing to register, sentence and dispose …

The inevitability of automation Read More »

The new government ethical AI principles and what they mean for information management automation

Yesterday, Minister for Industry, Science and Technology Karen Andrews announced the AI Ethics Framework, consisting of a set of Principles, and guidance for how and when to apply them. In essence, the government hopes these principles will be used by anyone designing or implementing an AI-based system that produces outcomes that could impact people, the …

The new government ethical AI principles and what they mean for information management automation Read More »

DC2020 failures confirmed by ANAO

In 2017, I wrote an article about the problems with the Digital Continuity 2020 program, specifically its Business Systems Assessment Framework (BSAF) approach to achieving records compliance in business systems. The BSAF could never have worked, and ANAO has since found that the gains expected by the program will not be achieved by 2020 (or, …

DC2020 failures confirmed by ANAO Read More »